Plain language summary
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common sexual dysfunction in men, which is defined as the failure to achieve or maintain an erection for satisfactory sexual intercourse. Besides aging, diabetes mellitus has also been recognised as a major risk factor for ED. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the association between prediabetes and ED. This study is a meta-analysis of nine observational studies, including five matched case-control studies and four cross-sectional studies. Results show that compared to men with normoglycemia, those with prediabetes were associated with higher prevalence of ED. Further subgroup analysis showed that mean age of the male participants in each study may affect the results as the association between prediabetes and ED seemed to be stronger in studies with younger men (mean age <50 years) than that in studies with older men (mean age ≥50 years). Authors conclude that prediabetes is associated with higher prevalence of ED, which may be independent of age of the males and may be stronger in young men.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes has been associated with the increased risk of erectile dysfunction (ED). However, previous studies evaluating the association between prediabetes and ED showed inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to systematically evaluate the above association. METHODS Relevant observational studies were retrieved by search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A random-effect model which incorporated the potential intra-study heterogeneity was used for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the influences of study characteristics on the outcome. RESULTS Nine studies (five matched case-control studies and four cross-sectional studies) were included. Age were adjusted or matched in all of the studies. Pooled results showed that compared to men with normoglycemia, men with prediabetes were associated with higher prevalence of ED (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.28 to 2.07, P < 0.001; I2 = 78%). Subgroup analyses showed that the association was not significantly affected by definition of prediabetes, diagnostic tool for ED, or controlling of additional variables besides age (both P for subgroup difference > 0.05). However, the association between prediabetes and ED seemed to be stronger in case-control studies than that in cross-sectional studies, and in studies with younger men (mean age < 50 years) than in those with older men (mean age ≥ 50 years; both P for subgroup difference < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Prediabetes is associated with higher prevalence of ED, which may be independent of age of the males and may be stronger in young men.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
